v6.6 · OPEN INNOVATION · TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER · COMMERCIALISATION
National Innovation & Problem-to-Market Intelligence
Convert public problems and research into validated technologies, adopted products, public value, productive enterprises and export capability.
Can this problem be solved better—and what must be true before adoption or scale?
01Problem
02Research
03Technology
04Prototype
05Validation
06Pilot
07Product
08Procurement
09Adoption
10Scale
11Market
12Export
13Impact
CRITICAL DISTINCTIONS
A dashboard must not confuse activity with outcome.
Idea ≠ innovation
Research ≠ technology
Patent ≠ useful product
Prototype ≠ validated solution
Pilot ≠ adoption
Procurement ≠ product approval
Scale ≠ copy-paste
Startup ≠ successful business
COMPLETE INTELLIGENCE MODEL
44 connected decision layers.
Use filters, evidence states and place context to move from a national system to a district or local decision.
FLAGSHIP ENGINES
Turn system knowledge into decisions.
DATA CONTRACT
Minimum records before the system can make a claim.
TECHNOLOGY
Technology record
readiness · evidence · owner · IP · dependency · validation
PROTOTYPE
Prototype record
version · test · result · failure · lesson · next gate
COMMERCIALISATION
Commercialisation record
product · customer · unit economics · adoption · market · export
DECISION ROOM
Compare action, delay and uncertainty.
Every recommendation shows place, affected people, mechanism, alternatives, cost, capability, risk, evidence, responsible institution, time to benefit and stop/modify/scale criteria.
Research firstPrototypePilotAdoptModifyStopScale
WHY SHOULD I TRUST THIS?
Open trust methodology →Inspect the record, not the badge.
Evidence strengthInsufficientNo reliable conclusion yet
VerificationUnreviewedSeparate from evidence level
Source qualityNot assessedSource ≠ evidence
FreshnessReview requiredData year must be visible
ConflictNot declaredCOI check required
Record typeNational Innovation & Problem-to-Market IntelligenceFact, finding, opinion or proposal
What we know
No verified finding is claimed until the source, geography, date, method and review status are complete.
What we don't know
Scale, affected groups, causal strength and likely intervention effect require location-specific evidence.
What is disputed
Credible disagreement will be shown by definition, data year, geography, method and source quality.
What could change our mind
New district data, independent evaluation, a larger sample, longer follow-up or contradictory evidence.
Suggest a correctionVersion history · No published revisions
Public provenance
Claim ID, claimant type, evidence IDs, source IDs, reviewer, decision, correction history and limitations will appear here when a reviewed record exists.